Epistemic Game Theory and Logic: Introduction
نویسنده
چکیده
Epistemic game theory and the systems of logic that support it are crucial for understanding rational behavior in interactive situations in which the outcome for an agent depends, not just on her own behavior, but also on the behavior of those with whom she is interacting. Scholars in many fields study such interactive situations, that is, games of strategy. Epistemic game theory presents the epistemic foundations of a game’s solution, taken as a combination of strategies, one for each player in the game, such that each strategy is rational given the combination. It considers the beliefs of the players in a game and shows how, along with the players’ goals, their beliefs guide their choices and settle the outcome of their game. Adopting the Bayesian account of probability, as rational degree of belief, it yields Bayesian game theory. Epistemic game theory, because it attends to how players reason strategically in games, contrasts with evolutionary game theory, which applies to non-reasoning organisms such as bacteria. Logic advances rules of inference for strategic reasoning. It contributes not just standard rules of deductive logic, such as modus ponens, but also rules of epistemic logic, such as the rule going from knowledge of a set of propositions to knowledge of their deductive consequences, and rules of probabilistic reasoning such as Bayesian conditionalization, which uses probabilities conditional on receiving some new evidence to form new non-conditional probabilities after receiving exactly that new evidence. Perea [1] offers an overview, and Weirich [2] shows how principles of choice support solutions to games of strategy. The papers in the special issue came in response to the journal’s call for papers. Diversity of perspectives was a goal. The papers include four by economists, one by computer scientists, three by philosophers, and one by a psychologist. They display a variety of approaches to epistemic game theory and logic. The following paragraphs briefly describe the topics of the papers, grouped according to discipline and within a discipline according to date of publication.
منابع مشابه
Epistemic logics and their game theoretic applications: Introduction
This paper is written as an introduction to epistemic logics and their game theoretic applications. It starts with both semantics and syntax of classical logic, and goes to the Hilbert-style proof-theory and Kripke-style model theory of epistemic logics. In these theories, we discuss individual decision making in some simple game examples. In particular, we will discuss the distinction between ...
متن کاملQuestion – Answer Games ( extended abstract )
I am in the middle of Manhattan and I am lost. I approach a likely stranger on the road and ask him, pointing to the right: “Is this the way to the railway station?” Discounting for a moment the possibility that I will be ignored and that the stranger will continue on his way (of which the—trivial—game move equivalent would be “I prefer not to answer the question”), I will now get one of three ...
متن کاملMelvin Fitting Reasoning About Games
A mixture of propositional dynamic logic and epistemic logic that we call PDL + E is used to give a formalization of Artemov’s knowledge based reasoning approach to game theory, (KBR), [4, 5, 6, 7]. Epistemic states of players are represented explicitly and reasoned about formally. We give a detailed analysis of the Centipede game using both proof theoretic and semantic machinery. This helps ma...
متن کاملTR-2010002: Reasoning About Games
A mixture of propositional dynamic logic and epistemic logic is used to give a formalization of Artemov’s knowledge based reasoning approach to game theory, (KBR), [4, 5, 6, 7]. We call the (family of) logics used here PDL + E. It is in the general family of Dynamic Epistemic Logics [21], was applied to games already in [20], and investigated further in [18, 19]. Epistemic states of players, us...
متن کاملProcedural Information and the Dynamics of Belief
The point of departure for modern epistemic and doxastic logic is Jaakko Hintikka’s seminal book Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions (1962)1. While Hintikka’s project sparked some discussion among mainstream epistemologists (especially regarding the “KK Principle”: Does knowing something imply that one knows that one knows it?2), much of the work on epistemic a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games
دوره 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017